668d313ccf | 4 years ago | |
---|---|---|
docker_image_ex | 4 years ago | |
kuard | 4 years ago | |
manifests | 4 years ago | |
scripts | 4 years ago | |
.gitignore | 4 years ago | |
README.md | 4 years ago | |
objects.md | 4 years ago |
README.md
Kubernetes up and Running
Setting your kubeconfig
To make it easier on you copy your kube config file to the root of this project and name it kubeconfig.conf. Then just remember to run source scripts/profile
to start using the kubectl command. I am just setting the KUBECONFIG envar to the kubeconfig.conf file for the bash session.
Accessing a pod from your laptop
Portforwarding
kubectl port-forward <pod name> <port>:<pod_port>
Basic logging
kubectl logs <pod name>
Stream logs with -f
kubectl logs -f <pod name>
To view logs from the previous pod. Useful if the pod instances keep restarting.
kubectl logs --previous <pod_name>
Running commands in your container with exec
One off commands
kubectl exec <pod name> <cmd>
kubectl exec kuard date
Interactive sessions
kubectl exec -it <pod name> <cmd>
Copying files to and from a running container
This is gnerally an anti-pattern. You should be treating the contents of a container as immutable.
kubectl cp <pod name>:<path> <host path>
kubectl cp <host path> <pod name>:<path>
Demo app
https://github.com/kubernetes-up-and-running/kuard
Here is an example of using the cgroups access to limit container resources to 200mb of ram and 1G of swap. If these resources are exceed, which you can test with the kuard application, the container will be terminated.
docker run -d --name kuard -p 8080:8080 --memory 200m --memory-swap 1G docker1.runcible.io:5151/kuard:latest
If we wanted to limit cpu you could use
docker run -d --name kuard -p 8080:8080 --memory 200m --memory-swap 1G --cpu-shares 1024 docker1.runcible.io:5151/kuard:latest
Exposing a service
Legacy (1.17?) way
THIS APPARENTLY IS THE LEGACY WAY OF DOING IT.
Start by creating a deployment
kubectl run alpaca-prod \
--image=gcr.io/kuar-demo/kuard-amd64:blue \
--replicas=3 \
--port=8080 \
--labels="ver=1,app=alpaca,env=prod"
Then expose the deployment with a Service
kubectl expose deployment alpaca-prod
Then check on your service
kubectl get services -o wide
Consider adding a readiness check to the deployment. This will be used by the service to only forward traffic to ready services. You can watch the endpoints used by the service (and watch containers removed from a service) with:
kubectl get endpoints alpaca-prod --watch
The new way
Note: kubectl create deployment doesn't support --labels=
keyword for some dumb fucking reason.
Create the deployment
kubectl create deployment alpaca-prod \
--image=gcr.io/kuar-demo/kuard-amd64:blue \
--replicas=3 \
--port=8080 \
Label it and the pods
kubectl label deployment env=prod ver=1
kubectl label pod --selector=app=alpaca-prod env=prod ver=1
Expose the service while also defining the selector
kubectl expose deployment --type=NodePort --selector="app=alpaca-prod,ver=1,env=prod"
Then check on your service
kubectl get services -o wide
Consider adding a readiness check to the deployment. This will be used by the service to only forward traffic to ready services. You can watch the endpoints used by the service (and watch containers removed from a service) with:
kubectl get endpoints alpaca-prod --watch
Accessing the exposed service
A cheap way in dev is just to use port forwarding
ALPACA_PROD=$(kubectl get pods -l app=alpaca -o jsonpath='{items[0].metadata.name}')
kubectl port-forward $ALPACA_PROD 48858:8080
Another potentially production capable alternative is to use a NopePort type. This will open a port on all workers that will forward traffic to the service.
Option 1: Expose as NodePort
kubectl expose deployment --type=NodePort alpaca-prod
Option 2: Modify Service switching to NodePort
kubectl edit service alpaca-prod
change the spec.type
field to NodePort and save.
check the port it is being served under:
kubectl describe service alpaca-prod
LoadBalancer Services
If the cloud environment supports it you should be able to edit the spec.type
to us LoadBalancer
.
This builds on top of NodePort
and your cloud provider create a new load balancerand direct it at
nodes in your cluster. This should eventually assign an EXTERNAL-IP with a public IP(or hostname)
assigned by the cloud vendor.